This crime with a girl of such a tender age is so heinous that it is difficult to find a word to express one's annoyance and anger in the English dictionary.  Unfortunately, this type of crime happens almost everyday in the Indian cities without any right kind of punishment for the perpetrators.  In order to stop or at least reduce these crimes, it is an opportune time for the Indian judiciary to implement laws awarding a harsh punishment to the criminals as well as a quick disposal of these type of cases.  It is true that the machinery under a democratic system is slow, inefficient and consists of corruption and nepotism, but the responsibility lies on the shoulders of the judiciary to make sure these negative systems are not allowed to crawl into the implementation of anti-rape legislation.  When this writer talks about a harsh punishment, it means once the guilt is proven, the criminal ought to go behind bar for 10-15 years without any parole, and if the rapist becomes responsible for the life of a victim, a death penalty should be awarded automatically.  What happened in December 2012 in Delhi is a live example and this writer applauds the decision announced by the judiciary for the perpetrators.  This type of decisions should be the guiding light on a nationwide basis for any such heinous crime because harsh punishment is the only way to safeguard the honor, prestige and liberty of the female community in the country.  I wonder if the leaders of the nation have the courage and responsibility to help promulgate such legislation.  Speaking specifically of this instance, raping a 5-year old girl warrants a death penalty without wasting too much time in the legal courts.

It was very sad what happened a year ago to Ms. Nirbhaya.  However, it is interesting to note that a trust is being established for the rape victims and there is an assurance from the Delhi Chief Minister to erect a monument or some kind of structure in her memory.  One wonders if hugging the bereaved families by the politicians, creating trusts for the future victims or spending tons of money for erecting structures in the memory of those who lost their lives due to rape, is the real solution to avoid occurrence of similar incidents.  This writer is in no way trying to diminish the importance and significance of all these gestures, but wonders if there could be a better solution to eradicate or at lease reduce this menace of inhuman behavior nationwide.  It was also sad to note that one of the perpetrators who was juvenile was awarded only three-years sentence.  I am sure it was done in pursuance of the terms and conditions stipulated in the Indian Constitution, even though I do not profess to be an expert in that department.  But, as Nirbhaya's Mom sadly expressed her opinion about this judgment, it sounds like a mockery of the Indian judiciary system.  May be this is an opportune time for the experts to review the relevant terms and condition of the Indian Constitution. Ms. Nirbhaya's case is not the end of this menace, females in India encounters this malicious and inhuman behavior nationwide on a daily basis.  Therefore, if the politicians are serious enough to eradicate this menace, a nationwide tough law is needed for the future rapists which means, once proven guilty irrespective of age, party affiliation, status in the society, a minimum long-term hard labor sentence of may be ten years should be automatic without any parole.  For serious crime where the victim loses her life, a death penalty need not to be considered out of line.  ARE THE INDIAN POLITICIANS INTERESTED IN HUGGING THIS NATIONWIDE ANTI-RAPE LEGISLATION TO SAFEGUARD AND PRESERVE THE DUE RESPECT THE FEMALE COMMUNITY DESERVES?

Mr. Nawaz Sharif's government is coming out with all sorts of proposals/invitations to the Indian Prime Minister to resolve outstanding issues between the two countries.  There is nothing new in these proposals.  India has been trying sincerely since the birth of Pakistan on these issues.  Failure of these discussions eventually led both countries to four wars with devastating aftermath.   However, the Pakistani government is not saying anything about the eradication of terrorism from its territory which is the stumbling block of improving relations.  In the eyes of Pakistani government, Kashmir is a big issue when the Indian government does not even recognize it as an issue.  As far as withdrawal of Indian forces from the Siachen area is concerned, Indian government  should know that it is ploy so that the Chinese can easily walk into the Indian territory at their own free will without facing the Indian defense forces.  Indian government has taken a right decision of not to exchange any dialogue until there are signs of eradication of terrorism from Pakistan and a peaceful status on LOC.  Sudden rush on the part of Pakistani government to sign some kind of agreement towards resolving some of the issues with the present Indian government shows that may be they are not sure if the new government will be that malleable.  Right now Pakistan has no friends, except China, and the government being in a state of fragility and despair is looking around some kind of solace. 

Recent Assembly election in a few States has shown the awareness of fundamental rights among Aam Aadmi Janta.  AAP (Aam Aadmi Party) has been supported by the voters in Delhi openly against all odds - being a new and unknown party.  Now is the time to see what AAP can do to bring some relief in the basic food prices which Aam Aadmi can afford.  However, this writer is very confused of sensing an unwillingness to join hands between BJP and AAP when the motto of both parties has been all along to remove corruption, bring back black money from overseas banks, punish the culprits, and eradicate crime from the face of India.  At least these were the pre-election slogans emanating from the leaders of both these parties.  Then what could be the reason of not sitting together and chalking out a policy to accomplish the objective of pre-election slogans?  Is it a politics again or a personality conflict?  AAP is a new party, but one will hope that BJP has learnt some lessons from its previous mistakes of not taking care of farmers and poor people, showing a blind eye towards corrupt BJP officials and almost a failed foreign policy especially towards Pakistan.  One may not be off the line in predicting that there is a good chance that BJP might come in the center also next year.  Therefore, it is an opportune time to chalk out national and international policies to avoid past mistakes.  Also, AAP being a new party, so far only in Delhi, can't escape itself from the responsibility and obligations it has towards Aam AAdmi Janta.  Rather, AAP has to work harder to show its constituencies that it can deliver what it vouched for in the pre-election slogans.  TIME OF COURSE WILL BE THE BEST JUDGE, BUT BOTH BJP AND AAP LEADERS SHOULD ALWAYS KEEP IN MIND THAT THE INDIAN VOTERS ARE INTELLIGENT AND AWAKEN AND THEY CAN ALWAYS CHANGE REGIME WHEN THE TIME COMES.

Ms. Rice is correct in saying that the benefits which could have been harnessed from the civil nuclear agreement signed by both India and the USA have not been realized due to civil legal liability issue for which both nations are struggling to find a solution to this enigma.  It is not a big deal.  If both nations are serious enough, there is a solution to tackle this issue.  This legal liability issue can be handled the same way Terrorism coverage is being handled in the United States.  Private insurance industries in both countries along with the US government can share the risk of civil liability under this agreement.  The risk can be shared on an excess or quota share basis between all these entities by accepting a proportionate share of the premium associated with this risk.  It is true that like any other project, this agreement also has the potential of larger benefits linked with the potential of civil legal liability of nuke risk.  But the risk associated with any project ought not to take a precedence on the over all benefits to be derived from any given project, so long as a proper protection, safety features and the financial ramifications are contemplated.  Ms. Rice is also correct in saying that if the relationship between India, Pakistan and Afghanistan improves, it can be very conducive to the three economies.  But that is a major "IF".  Relationship among these three countries - especially between India and Pakistan as well as between Pakistan and Afghanistan can't be improved until the civilian government in Islamabad is in a position to eradicate the sentiment of terrorism from its territory, dismantle the training centers of militants, maintain law and order situation in Pakistan, get itself released from the clutches of Pakistani military/ISI nexus and start thinking out of the box that India is not an enemy of Pakistan.  Prosperous Pakistan is a healthy news for India which will help all the neighboring countries to live in peace and enjoy prosperity. Resources being spent on the military in both counties can be earmarked for other civilian projects to make the region more prosperous.  UNFORTUNATELY, THE BALL IS IN THE COURT OF PAKISTAN AND THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING CURIOUSLY TO SEE THE OUTCOME ESPECIALLY WHEN THE NATO FORCES WALK OUT OF AFGHANISTAN.

It is astonishing that all of a sudden various wings of the Islamabad government have started talking about Kashmir issue claiming that this is the flashpoint which could trigger another war between India and Pakistan.  These statements are so ironical that one can't help but to feel sorry about the leaders of Pakistan because they fully know that all the previous wars were started by Pakistan via. Kashmir.  Hence, it is imperative for them to mend their own fences first before blaming India for all the troubles both countries are facing.  Pakistan is instrumental in propping up its proxies in J & K area via separatist leaders of JKLF, Hurriyat Group and Moderate Hurriyat.  Recently Mr. Nawaj Sharif's National Security Advisor had a meeting on his visit to Delhi with all the three entities which one leads to conclude that there is a deep understanding and collusion among all the parties.  Needless to say, Pakistan has been providing these separatists leaders with all financial, diplomatic and arsenal support from day one.  Therefore, these diplomatic statements do not mean anything as far as resolving the problems between the two countries.  This writer holds a firm opinion that there can't be any peace between India and Pakistan till the organizational chart of Islamabad government is amended to the effect that the ISI/Military nexus is made subservient to the civil government in Islamabad.  Since the birth of Pakistan, this nexus of Military/ISI has been calling all the shots, hence the problems being faced by both India and Pakistan.  THIS NEEDS TO BE CHANGED URGENTLY IF PEACE HAS TO PREVAIL.

What Prime Minister Sharif is saying about Kashmir is nothing new.  Kashmir has been a flashpoint between India and Pakistan since 1947 and these slogans have been floating around since the time Pakistan was born.  Four wars have already been fought on the issue of Kashmir.  These slogans are meant to pacify the local people in general and the militant groups in particular.  Right now, Pakistan is in a fix and is going through lot of domestic economic, financial, political, cultural and administrative issues to handle.  Pakistan is not in a position to find a solution to these problems, and hence these slogans are tactics Pakistani government is applying to deviate peoples' attention.  I agree with ex-Lt. General Hoon when he stated that Pakistan can't be trusted.  On one hand, Mr. Sharif is pretending to be extending an olive branch to ameliorate relations between India and Pakistan and on the other hand making an overt vociferous war mongering statement in front of people of POK sounds so ironical.  I admire Mr. Manmohan Singh's riposte on this issue.  India need not to pay too much attention to these hollow statements emanating from the Pakistani government, but to make sure that the Indian defense forces are equipped with the best arsenal available in the world to cope  with any untoward incident.  Recently, Mr. Sharif's National Security Advisor also made a statement stating that the Indian forces should vacate the Siachen area.  So, one can see this new common trend of empty political and diplomatic statements being released from Islamabad.  Since Mr. Sharif has been sitting on the Islamabad throne for the forth time, one would have hoped that he learnt a lesson from his previous failed policies while chalking out his new policy towards India.  But it appears that he is still walking and talking under the influence of bunch of militant groups and military/ISI nexus.  Under the circumstances, this writer is very pessimistic and don't see any light at the end of tunnel except may be a light of an express train coming out of this tunnel which is fast moving to bring destruction in the region.  INDIA NEEDS TO BE ON THE ALERT.

One can't blame Japan in cutting down its aid to China in view of their present territorial dispute.  China's authoritative pronouncement of ADIZ in the East China Sea is another example of its never-ending  desire to expand its empire wherever it can.  China is not a super power yet.  But one needs to visualize what China will be capable of doing once it becomes a super power.  By declaring ADIZ in that part of the world, China is evincing its prowess to the small neighboring countries by ignoring all international zoning laws along with the sentiments of these nations.  Many countries are so scared of China that they have started reporting the routing schedule of their civil airlines to China before flying over that part of the East China Sea.  However, Japan, South Korea and the USA do not recognize the ADIZ and the live example is USA flying two of its B-52 recently from Guam to Japan without any incident.  Now the question arises, if China is not serious about the enforcement of declaration of ADIZ in the East China Sea, what is the purpose of creating this nuisance in that part of the world.  This writer believes that China before it becomes a super power, it is using all these tactics to test the will power of the neighboring countries as to how far these nations can be pushed against the wall.  China is not using this type of tactics in the coastal areas only, even though Chinese authorities claim so.  But they are implementing the same tactics in the land areas too.  A live example is China's unilateral announcement of claiming Arunachal Pradesh ( an Indian territory) as part of China, China's illegal and forceful occupation of Leh/Ladakh area ( again an Indian territory) since 1962, China's occupation of Tibet since 1959 and so on.  It seems that China's recent fiscal and military strength are the driving forces of all these illegitimate claims, and the time has come that this insatiable territorial ambition is stopped.  Unfortunately, it is true that there are not too many nations which are capable of confronting China militarily except the United States and Russia.  Since Russia and China have good relations with each other, it is not expected of any such action from the Russian end.  Therefore, the worldly eyes are looking towards the United States to initiate some concrete action to check the seemed-to-be unstoppable foot steps of China into others' territories before it becomes too late. Definitely, building military ties among Japan, India and other countries in the South and East China Sea area will pose a substantial psychological threat to stop China to initiate any aggressive military move.

What Mr. Prasad is stating makes sense.  Even after five years of 26/11 happening, Pakistan is still unable to bring the culprits to books and looking for excuses to let them scot free.  Under these circumstances, it is a sheer waste of time and energy to engage with Pakistan on any of the issues.  India rather divert its attention to other more important issues facing the nation. As far as Pakistan's policy towards India is concerned, a civilian government in Islamabad is a handicapped body whose hands have been tied behind its back and legs have been crippled by the nexus of military/ISI of Pakistan.  As they say, tango dance can be performed by two persons with strong legs and satisfactory clapping with a great noise can be performed by two healthy hands.  In Pakistan's case, one should not expect any satisfactory tango dance and noisy clapping.  Hence, it is a waste of valuable resources and time to engage for any dialogues with Pakistan.  However, this writer wants to caution Mr. Prasad that if BJP is put on the throne next year, he should not forget the guidelines he is suggesting towards dealing with Pakistan.  Sometimes, it is easy to criticize other's policy than to implement so-called one's own better policy.   THIS WRITER WILL BE WATCHING THE TURN OUT OF ELECTION NEXT YEAR AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BJP'S POLICY TOWARDS PAKISTAN, IF THEY COME INTO POWER.

What Mr. Sharif says makes sense as far as improving relations with India is concerned.  However, to make the issuance of visa an open-ended situation does not make sense at all.  It will make militants' life very easy to enter into the Indian territory at their own free will which means more headache for the Indian authorities.  It appears that Mr. Sharif has learnt lot of lessons from his failed foreign policy of 1999 and, hence the change in his attitude towards India.  However, even though his intentions seem to be on the right track, but he has a lot of opposition from the militants and brain-washed groups in Pakistan who are adamant to oppose any kind of amelioration of relationship between the two countries.  In addition to these militants, one ought not to ignore the opposition faced by the civilian government in Islamabad from the Military/ISI nexus on this issue.  Mr. Sharif is very wrong in comparing India with Pakistan when he told a journalist of Times of India that "India and Pakistan are mirror images of each other."  They are not mirror images of each other, Mr. Sharif.  There is a big difference in the size, economy, freedom - called real democracy, respect of established institutions, education and peaceful atmosphere etc.  India, therefore, needs to be very careful about what Pakistani government is trying to do under the disguise of these peaceful statements.  India should not agree to any discussion till Pakistan eradicates terrorism from its territory, dismantle all militants' training center, hand-over Dawood Ibrahimn to the Indian government.  THIS IS THE RIGHT TIME FOR INDIA TO PLAY ITS CARDS RIGHT.

A newly developed political and diplomatic chess game in the Middle-East is getting very interesting.  Rift between the USA and Saudi Arabia over Syria and Iran issue, problem between Israel and Iran but supported by Saudi Arabia against the Iranian nuke policy as well as Saudi Arabia's overt tilt of taking its shopping cart for nuke and military equipment to Europe, China, Russia, India and Pakistan seems to have taken a 180 degree turn in the foreign and diplomatic posture of Saudi Arabia.  Of course, every country has the right to review its foreign policy from time to time, but this newly built military relationship between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan needs a very close probe in light of what it can entail in the long run.  In order to create a counter-weight against Iran, Saudi Arabia has evinced its interest to seek Pakistan's help to create a special military force of about 50,000 die-hard soldiers and also has an open order of buying nukes from the warehouse of Pakistan.  This is a clear sign of proliferation of nuke technology and availability of destructive weapon in the Middle-East.  This trade could be worth multi-billion dollars which means Pakistan will have access to more money to produce more nukes which in turn means more headache for India.  This relationship will also make the Pakistani Military/ISI nexus more powerful which eventually means a more fragile and helpless civilian government in Islamabad.  Since India has good relations with both Iran and Saudi Arabia, it can't do much to avoid this new nexus between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.  What it can do though is to keep its own guards up and be vigilant of the impending aftermath of this relationship.  INDIA NEEDS TO BE PROACTIVE.

It is a good idea to keep the dialogues with Pakistan on, but to expect that something fruitful will come out of it is a figmentation of imagination.  India has been trying to find a so-called peace and tranquility between the two nation since 1947 through all sorts of summit meetings, but no concrete results came out of those meetings.  It seems like Mr. Sharif has learnt a lesson from his failed policy of 1999 and, hence his effort to improve relations with India.  Unfortunately, the Military/ISI/Civilian government structure of 'who actually reports to who' or should one say 'who actually makes decisions' towards India has not changed.  What it means is that even today all decisions are based on what the Pakistani military/ISI nexus wants towards India.  Civilian government has no say at all in this matter.  Under the circumstances when Mr. Sharif's hands are tied behind his back, how can one expect him to make any decision and be able to deliver it too.  Also, a recent meeting between Mr. Sharif's National Security Advisor - Mr. Aziz- and separatist groups of Kashmir is a clear indication that Pakistan has a very soft heart for those who are the proponents of separation of Kashmir.  THE PRE-CONDITION HIGHLIGHTED BY MR. KHURSHID IS VERY IMPORTANT, BUT THIS WRITER WOULD LIKE TO ADD ONE MORE PRE-CONDITION WHICH IS THAT KASHMIR ISSUE WILL NOT BE DISCUSSED AT ALL.

Pakistani armed forces are showing the technology it possesses to shoot down a drone just to appease Mr. Sharif and may be other influential leaders in the country.  After reviewing the scenario set by the Pakistani Army and the Air Force authorities, Mr. Sharif made a statement rejecting the activities of drones claiming that they are creating a hindrance in the pursuit of dialogues with the militants.  Making public statements like this one or displaying an anti-drone technology is just a show business.  In reality, Pakistan is not in a position to do anything to stop the drones coming into its skies and killing the militants left and right.  Just think, if Pakistan out of frustration starts shooting down drones, is Pakistan ready to face the wrath of US military might?  Is Pakistan willing to forego the financial assistance it is receiving from the USA?  Can Pakistan afford to live without the diplomatic backing it is receiving from the USA on various issues?  I don't think leaders in Islamabad are so out of synch to pursue this mission.  Then, what is the purpose of displaying this anti-drone technology and pep-talk diplomatic statements - nothing at all?  Therefore, instead of blaming the parties outside of Pakistan, Mr. Sharif needs to concentrate his authorities on the inside authorities and make sure that they do not initiate any action, objectionable to his government,  in Pakistan and/or on LoC without his knowledge - he should not forget what happened when Mr. Musharraf was the General.  He ought to change the organizational chart of military, ISI and the government in Islamabad and this chart should specifically state that Military/ISI report to the leaders in Islamabad and not the other way around.

By extending an invitation to the separatist groups' chiefs in India, Pakistani government is clearly showing its true colors as respects to improving relations with India.  It shows the mentality as well as the dual policy of the Pakistani government.  On one hand, Mr. Sharif is making announcement in front of the whole world to start fresh with the dialogues to ameliorate relationship between the two countries while on the other hand, it is working with their puppets in India who are proponents of separatism on the Kashmir issue.  It shows that Mr. Sharif has no real desire to improve relationship and has not learnt any lessons from his previous failed policies of 1999 or should one say that he has no authority to work in that direction due to an influence from the military/ISI nexus.  Whatever the reason may be, the fact remains that he is working with his hands tied behind his back and he is walking with crippled legs to win this marathon.  Under that circumstance, how can anyone expect to achieve something both nations have been cherishing to accomplish? So, India ought not to waste time in arranging all these summit meetings to exchange dialogues with the hope to accomplish something worthwhile.  INDIA SHOULD LEAVE PAKISTAN ALONE AND LET IT MEET ITS OWN DESTRUCTIVE DESTINY TO THE FINISH.

It appears Pakistan is begging to resume talk with India on multiple issues.May be the new government in Islamabad wants to show to the world that it is making a sincere effort to improve relations with India.  However,this writer has a different opinion about Pak government.It wants to appease the local people and the politicians on one side, but on the other side, the government is blindfolded and not paying any attention to what the military/ISI nexus is doing on the LoC.  Pak military is violating ceasefire continuously and the Indian Jawans are killed on a regular basis for no reason.India has taken a right decision not to dwell on further dialogues unless (a) militancy is eliminated from the Pakistani territory (b) Mumbai attackers are punished severely; (c) Complete ceasefire on LoC.  Also,Kashmir issue is not to be discussed at all should be on this list too.If Pak agrees, then all other issues will be sorted out to mutual benefits.INDIA NEEDS TO BE FIRM THIS TIME

The main purpose of these militant groups is to kill people, create a chaotic situation and anarchy wherever they live and operate.  Also, they want to bring Sharia Law in all countries which means the people in those countries will be forced to live a life style of 7th century.  Lot of petro dollars are being given to these brain-washed militants to fulfill this objective.  Their philosophy is same whether they are in Asia, Europe, Africa and in the American continent.  No civilized nation likes their way of leading a life.  It is inhuman, destructive and disrespectful to mankind.  So, logically speaking, the aim of the civilized nations ought to be to eliminate this threat from the face of earth for the sake of mankind.  Since Pakistan has become ground zero of terrorism and, unfortunately, the Pakistani government is not able to control the activities of these brain-washed militants, some one has to do it for the sake of mankind again. Yes, the integrity and sovereignty of any nation needs to be protected, but if that nation is not capable of controlling the menace it is spreading around, someone else has to step in.  That is what US drones are trying to do for the whole world.  This writer was surprised to hear China condemning US drones activities in Pakistan.  I don't think US wants to do this either, but it is the inability of Pakistan which is compelling US to take this action.  Is China forgetting that its Northwest -Xijiang - region also has this militancy brewing and , by the way, these Chinese militants are being trained in Pakistan?  Has China forgotten a recent suicidal blast in Tianamann Square?  The seed of militancy has already been planted in China too and it is a matter of time when this seed will become a big tree - a tree full of thorns and without any cool shadow.  China ought to be thankful to the USA for terminating these militant miscreants on behalf of the whole world.  PAKISTANIS OUGHT TO BE READY OF DARK FUTURE UNLESS ISLAMABAD BECOMES CAPABLE OF CONTROLLING THE MILITANCY

Pakistani government has been unable to control the activities of the militant groups not because of US drone attacks, but due to the implicit understanding between the militants and the military/ISI nexus.These militants are not rich people, they are dirt cheap poor people.  However, they carry all modern defense equipment and bullets.Who buys that kind of armaments for them?Mr. Mehsud, the leader of Pakistani militant group who got killed couple of days ago was living in a posh bungalow/farmhouse.Who paid for that property?So, the problem is not with the US drone attacks, the crux of the problems lies within the Pakistani Military/ISI establishment which is helping these militant group to stay in power for their own selfish interest.  If today, all militant groups surrender their guns and exchange dialogues with Islamabad for peace, would anyone sees any need of US drones to be in Pakistan? Not at all. So, instead of blaming on US drones, Pakistan needs to mend fences internally

Finally, China is also tasting a fruit it has been growing unintentionally for a long time which is very bitter, destructive and unpleasant.  This fruit is known as worldwide terrorism and the origin of this menace is not too far from Chinese border.  In fact it is next to the Chinese border called Pakistan.  Historically, China has been helping Pakistan with all kinds of assistance - militarily, economically as well as diplomatically.  While China was helping Pakistan for its own economic and military objectives, to their surprise, the militancy was shaping up in Pakistan and the Chinese from the Xijiang Province were being trained in Pakistan too.  It seems that what China recently witnessed at the Tiananmen Square is just a small sample of what is waiting in the wings to happen.  China ought to understand that Terrorism is a global phenomenon and not necessarily limited to a specific country.  Since the militants are using Pakistan as a training ground, one wonders why China or for that matter any country would like to maintain relationship with Pakistan - ground zero of flourishing Terrorism.  This writer is a firm believer of eradication of terrorism from the face of this earth and any contribution from any one is a big step towards the welfare and survival of a mankind.  WOULD CHINA LIKE TO TALK TO ITS FRIEND ACROSS THE BORDER NOT TO LET PAKISTANI TERRITORY BEING USED FOR THE TRAINING OF MILITANTS?

India's bashing of Pakistan is not without any base.  The daily skirmishes and deaths of civilian and army jawans on the border are facts based on which India tries to draw world's attention to the uncontrollable activities on the part of Pakistani establishment - Military/ISI nexus.  It is a well known fact that as far as Pakistan's relations with India are concerned, the civilian government in Islamabad has no control on the policy making and activities of ISI/Military nexus.  Therefore, instead of blaming India, Mr. Sharif ought to try to show some assertiveness on the activities of ISI/military nexus, may be by changing an organizational chart of Pakistan government with a Constitutional amendment, if need be.  Yes, it is a good sign that his government is trying to sit with the Taliban group to find out what they want and, hopefully, it will lead to some fruitful conclusion to bring peace in Pakistan and in the Region.  Even though it is a long shot, but one should not leave hope and that is what the whole world has HOPE.

What happened in Bihar is disgraceful.  It shows an inability or should one say a conspiracy on the part of local law and order authorities of not being able to sense or control this impending terror act which, according to report, was financed, monitored and executed by the ISI.  To a greater extent the responsibility of this mishap lies on the shoulder of central government also of not being able to put a leash on the activities of ISI in India.  One can understand that the governments in Bihar and at the center are opponents of BJP.  But here the question is not of party politics, rather it conveys a message of lack of intelligence, inability and a deep division in the political arena.  Keeping aside party politics, this writer looks at facts and based on the initial reports, the facts lead one to conclude that there is a great need of understanding among the policy makers to show unity, irrespective of party affiliation, when it comes to security of India.  Political differences and misunderstanding can be sorted out with dialogues among themselves or at the polling booths.  But this should not provide an opportunity to the nations across the border to exploit our internal political weakness.  INDIA  NEEDS TO BE PROACTIVE AGAINST THESE SO-CALLED IMPORTED TERRORIST ACTIVITIES

What Mr. Xi is saying is correct.  By establishing business, educational and cultural relationship is the only way to improve relationship and peace in the region.  He also referred to the border security issues with the neighboring countries which is very encouraging indeed.  I think China is on the right path if it really follows what Mr. Xi is intending to say in his address at the conference of Standing Committee of the CPC Central Committee's Politburo.  However, this writer has some apprehensions about the real intent of Chinese government.  Chinese attitude and behavior towards the neighboring countries especially in the South and East China Sea area, and also Chinese territorial ambition around India - illegally penetrating into the Indian territory of Arunachal Pradesh, illegally occupying thousands of square miles in the Ladakh area and issuing separate paper visa to people intending to visit China from the Kashmir area. IS THIS WRITER MISSING SOMETHING?

This is just another ridiculous act on the part of Chinese government not to stamp the Indian passport of Indian citizens living in Arunachal Pradesh who are going to visit China, and rather the Chinese government issues a separate paper with the Chinese visa.  They had done the same thing for the Indian citizens living in Srinagar area.  Chinese action leads one to believe that the Chinese Government does not consider Arunachal Pradesh and Srinagar as part of India - these are disputed territories in the eyes of China.  Basically, this shows China's insatiable territorial ambition.  They are encroaching in Bhutan, have forcefully occupied Tibet since 1959, have been occupying thousand and thousand square miles of Indian territory in Ladakh/Leh  area since 1962.  They just walk into another countries' territories freely.  It appears that their increasing economic and military power have put a blinder in front of their eyes and they do not see and care of anything except to fulfill their desire to expand their empire.  I think it is about time that India takes up this issue at all international forums and reverse Chinese attitude so that Chinese can respect and honor the integrity and sovereignty of other countries.  When Sadam Hussain invaded Kuwait, the whole civilized world woke up and stood against Sadam Hussain.  Rest is history.  Now China is slowly and slowly pilfering the territories of other countries, one wonders why the civilized world is not paying any attention to Chinese activities and condemn them.  It sounds like a dual policy.  May be in case of Kuwait, western nations' economic interest  (OIL) was involved and in case of India and other small countries neighboring China, there is no economic interest involved.  Anyhow, whatever the reason may be, it is about time that the western nations take note of what China is doing to establish its own hegemony in Asia, if not worldwide, before it is too late.

Mr. Khurshid is right in saying that exchange of dialogues and communication is the only way to find solution to the problems lingering between India and Pakistan.  He is also right in stating that India should not play into the hands of jihadis and/or those who do not want to see any improvement of relations between these two countries.  Unfortunately, India has been treading on this path of exchanging dialogues and intense communication since 1947, but without any fruitful outcome. One wonders how long one can wait before any decision is made to tackle these problems via. other means.  Also, as the proverb goes, you need two to tango and you need two healthy hands to clap.  However, as the situation exists in Islamabad, the civilian government has no control on the Jihadis/ISI/Army nexus which is basically controlling the show in Pakistan.  So the civilian government can't stand on its two feet and can't take any action against the wishes of this nexus.  One wonders how can Delhi expect Islamabad government to deliver something worthwhile and long lasting when the legs and arms of the latter have been crippled.  INDIA CAN KEEP TRYING FOR ANOTHER 66 YEARS, BUT THIS WIRTER IS NOT VERY OPTIMISTIC ABOUT ANY FRUITFUL OUTCOME UNLESS THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF CIVILIAN GOVERNMENT IN ISLAMABAD IS CHANGED.

Finally, the law has caught up with Mr. Lalu and he will pay the price of his misdeeds along with others who were involved in the same food scam or other illegal activities.  The Bihar court has made a right decision which is very badly needed in India to set a precedence in the country to lessen, if not eradicate, corruption from the society.  It is so ironical that Mr. Lalu pleaded before the judge to lessen his sentence because he was two times CM of Bihar and also a Railways Minister.  In my opinion, since he was holding such privileged posts, Mr. Lalu should have presented himself as a role model for the nation and stayed away from illegal activities.  Rather he chose to let his monetary greed take precedence over his moral and civil obligations. In view of the fact that Mr. Lalu and group has cheated the treasury with muti-crores of rupees, the financial penalty imposed on them is too little.  Their disproportionate assets ought to be taken into consideration also, and if not accounted for, should be confiscated and made them a state property.  One just hopes that this verdict sets a good example for others to abstain from such corrupt activities.

I do not agree with the views presented in this article which basically hold Kayani's presence in the army as the problem of creating bad sentiments and relations between India and Pakistan. Yes, Kayani is holding a good position - a position which has been influencing the decisions about India- but it is not the only problem. There are other elements - mainly ISI outfits along with fanatic Islamists groups - in Pakistan which do not want to see any improvement in these relations. No matter how hard the civilian government in Islamabad wants to ameliorate the relationship between the two countries, but the Jihadis and the ISI establishment always try to derail these efforts. They want to mold Pakistan into a conservative Islamist country running on Sharia Law which basically takes the people of a given country to the 7th century life style. Unless the organizational chart of civilian/army/ISI entities in Pakistan is changed - meaning that the civilian government in Islamabad is declared the "boss' and all other departments and establishments report to the civilian government, this writer is not very hopeful that any replacement of Mr. Kayani will be able to bring a sigh of relief in the relationships. So, instead of waiting for the scenario to improve in Pakistan, what India ought to do is to carry on with the effort to dismantle Pakistan- such as help the Baloch towards freedom, work with the Sindhi community towards independence, also see if the KP Province of Pakistan needs help to separate themselves from Pakistan. Once Pakistan is reduced only to one Province - Panjab Province- lot of issues will be settled automatically.

The Judge in Rajasthan court has taken an appropriate decision in this matter by proclaiming a death penalty to the perpetrator.  I am sure the female community will be very happy to note this verdict and any future such perpetrator will think twice before getting involved into this type of heinous action.  This writer understands that each State in India may have different laws, but this is a national issue and ought to be handled keeping in mind the security and honor of all the females in the country.  It is not an issue of a particular State.  If our female community is safe and honored, that safety will enrich the families and enriched families will make the nation enriched.  It is the voice of the time which needs to be heard, and a nationwide legislation should be proclaimed - a death penalty to the convicted perpetrator depending upon the severity of a rape case - definitely a minimum life term imprisonment without parole.  AT LEAST THE LEGISLTORS CAN DELIVER THIS MUCH.

It is always good to have a dialogue to solve any lingering issues whether it is on a family, state, national or international level.  Mr. Sharif rightfully wants to follow the same path.  He wants to start his new assignment as a Prime Minister of Pakistan to make a new beginning by re-engaging India with a "..substantive and purposeful dialogue."  Hopefully, he has learnt a lesson from the previously failed policies of Pakistani government including two of his own.  However, as the whole world knows, the foreign policies especially pertaining to India emanating from Islamabad don't have much input from the Prime Minister's office rather they are written by the nexus of Army/ISI establishment.  In view of this, one wonders how much leverage Mr. Sharif has to deliver with his hands tied on his back in order to ameliorate relationship with India.  This writer is a firm believer of exchanging dialogue to solve any riddle, but also holds a firm belief that the clapping can be performed with two equally healthy hands.  One healthy and one crippled hand can't make an appreciable noise.  Does it mean that the leaders still ought to move forward and listen to each other or just drop the towel and move forward with other agenda more important than this one.  Since 1947 India has been unilaterally trying to move forward with the hope that relationship will improve, but so far it has been proven to be a failed attempt.  ONE WONDERS HOW MANY MORE ATTEMPTS NEED TO BE MADE BEFORE BYCOTTING THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR ONCE AND FOR ALL.

I think this judgment relays a very stern warning to those who even contemplate doing this type of heinous act.  Any act of rape is below the dignity of any human being irrespective of the rapist's age.  Accordingly, all rape cases ought to be treated without any mercy.  This writer holds a firm belief that once the guilt of rape is proven through the legal proceedings, it should call for automatic 'hanging' - no ifs and buts.  No consideration ought to be given whether the rapist was underage, in a intoxicated state of  mind, belonging to any particular party and has affiliation with any specific family  The law ought to be very clear and simple for a common to understand.  This should be a law to be followed nationwide.  I am sure the proper judgment in this case will be very conducive to reduce substantially, if not eliminate, the rap cases in the country which provides a big relief to the female community in India- especially a sigh of relief for the victim family.  FINALLY, THE INDIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM HAS SPOKEN.

I agree with Mr. Raju's statement about educating the female community worldwide, and India's gesture towards female education needs to be recognized widely.  It is the education which helps bring a sense of responsibility, awareness of individual rights and the value of being a valuable member to the society.  Needless to say, proper education for male community is needed for him to be able to earn livelihood for the family, but it is equally very essential that the female community is adequately educated also.  The reason behind this is that for a child, his/her first teacher is Mom till that child starts going to school.  One can safely say that first 4-5 years that child is learning everything from his/her Mom which basically lays the foundation of that child's character.  If Mom is educated, she will nurture her child with a sense of responsibility and inculcate all good qualities of life which will play a very important role in making that child a good citizen and a responsible person.  Moms' education will be conducive to educating families which in turn makes the whole society, and for that matter, turn the whole country educated.  Once a nation is educated, it will have a special respect in the eyes of world leaders and will be able to command a well deserved place in the business community too.  If one looks around in the countries where no importance is attached to the education for the female community, their life is like a hell.  Their citizens are still living in the 7th century life style.  How can one expect those illiterate people to have a reasonable and respectable life?  It is no fault of those people.  Unfortunately, they are on the mercy of their leaders.  THEREFORE, WHAT INDIA IS DOING IN THIS RESPECT IS ADMIRABLE.

Mr. Saeed is openly voicing his opinion as to how much he hates India and 10,000 people attending his rally have been influenced and brain washed by his anti-India slogans and sermans too.  One wonders what Pakistani government is doing to stop this fanaticism.  His main emphasis is to liberate Kashmir and declare the whole Kashmir area as part of Pakistan even though the Kashmiris living in POK area do not want to be part of Pakistan.  They want separation from both India and Pakistan.  They want their own nation.  If given an opportunity, they rather tilt towards India than Pakistan.  So, what Mr. Saeed is claiming is not predicated on the will of Kashmiris in the POK area, rather it is his own concoction.  It appears that his mental status needs to be probed.  He also has a funny and to a greater extent a questionable claim that if India and the US are against Pakistan, God is happy with Pakistan.  What a correlation?   one wonders how can one claim the mercy of God being affiliated with one of the killing organizations - the LeT.  This organization is responsible of killing so many innocent civilian people and its leaders, including Mr. Saeed, are openly claiming to kill more in the coming times.  They are doing it because they have the blessing of Pakistani army/ISI which is basically controlling the total machinery in Pakistan.  Civilian government in Islamabad is a puppet government which is dancing on the tune of military/ISI nexus.  It is high time for the Indian government to highlight these activities of LeT to the Pakistani government and demand ban on his activities failing which, there should be no dealing with Pakistan.

Mr. Shinde is 100% right in demanding Mr. Dawood's return to India.  Needless to say, Mr. Dawood has been declared by the international community as a terrorist and is wanted in India because of his involvement in the murder of 100s of innocent people.  Secondly, it is beyond my comprehension to figure out under which law the Pakistani government is sheltering an Indian national for so long.  Pakistani government is working very hard to arrange a meeting between Mr. Sharif and Mr. Singh in New York this month.  I think it is an opportune time for the Indian strategists to accept this meeting only with a pre-condition that Mr. Dawood will be handed over to the Indian government within 30 days of this meeting.  Only and only then, this meeting ought to go forward.  India has been showing an olive branch to the Pakistani government since 1947, but without any concrete outcome.  I think the time has come when India has to do everything to make Pakistan irrelevant.  However, to achieve this objective, there is a need for a  very strong government in New Delhi.  One can only hope that the next elected government irrespective of party will bear this in mind and deal with Pakistan with the treatment they deserve.

I could not agree more with the contents of this article.  It is really a mind boggling why the Indian government is ignoring a situation like this and treat Mr. Gilani like Mr. Saeed is being treated in Pakistan.    Both are roaming around with full impunity in their respective countries.  The only difference between the activities of Mr. Saeed and Mr. Gilani is that the Pakistani government/Army/ISI nexus is shielding Mr. Saeed even though he has been declared as an unlawful person by the international community whereas Mr. Gilani is openly demanding secession of Kashmir and is completely being abetted, financed and supported by the Pakistani nexus.  One wonders if the Indian government is afraid of Muslim community backlash or it does not  want to disturb its Muslim voting bank especially in view of an impending election.  If that is the case, I think it is a very narrow minded thinking and the politicians are playing politics at the cost of national security, and in my opinion both Congress and the BJP parties are equally responsible of their lack of willingness and inability to initiate any remedial action.  Politicians ought to keep party politics aside and do what is good for the country, and do not bend backward to pacify the Muslim community.  Under no circumstances, I am proposing to mistreat the Muslim community, rather I am a firm believer of providing equal opportunities irrespective of their cast, creed, sex and religious affiliation.  By the same token, all traitors, secessionists,  irrespective of their gender, cast, creed and religious affiliation ought to be punished adequately to protect the national security.  As we all know, China/Pakistan nexus is working very hard to encircle India and the day may not be too far if India has to face both countries militarily at the same time.  Therefore, internal unity along with military might are the main ingredients to maintain and protect at all cost.  One hopes that the next elected government will keep it in mind and be firm against people like Mr. Gilani whom I call ungrateful and traitor.

When there is a tense situation and probably involving the survivability of many innocent lives, it is better if cool heads prevail.  Unfortunately, the Syrian situation has taken a little bit different turn.  It is different because of usage of hazardous gases which is responsible of killing thousands and thousands of innocent people and also a high bar set by the statements of President Obama.  His statements particularly refer to crossing the 'red line'.  Per those statements, Syria has crossed a so called 'red line' which in turn has become a prestigious issue for the USA to keep its word of honor in tact, whatever is left in the eyes of people in the Middle East.  To deliver on his statements, Mr. Obama is doing his best to have the backing of an international community before initiating any military action against Syria.  Unfortunately, he does not seem to have much success.  In all probabilities, it seems that that action is inevitable even if the USA has to act unilaterally.  Needless to say, it might compound the problem on a much larger scale with the involvement of Iran, Israel and Hazbollah from Lebanon - not to talk of Russia and China in some fashion.  Hence, there is a need for a thorough probe of the situation and the cool heads to prevail before prompting any military action.  However, this writer is confused about the announcement of such action well in advance which provides enough time for the Syrian government to hide its military assets to avoid any losses.  If the intent of the US attack is to destroy Syria's military assets, wouldn't this early warning of military attack defeat the very purpose. A few relevant questions pop up in my head as to how long this military attack will go on, what if Assad regime does not fall, and if falls down who will take over, would that new government be friendly democratic government amenable to the USA.  If we don't have a satisfactory answer to those questions, one wonders if it is prudent to even get involved.  I THINK IT IS HIGH TIME TO THINK BEFORE LEAPING AHEAD WITH AN HAPHAZARD MOVE WHICH MIGHT BECOME VERY COSTLY.

In view of China flexing its muscles to fulfill their territorial ambition, it is an opportune time for India to join hands with the USA to circumvent Chinese mission,  For whatever reasons, the Indian government is not openly admitting that something is in the works to allow stationing of American forces on the shores of an Indian territory, but the fact that one of the American Air Force high officials has made a statement on this subject indicates that something is brewing,  Whatever the reason may be behind this maneuvering, this writer holds a firm opinion that cooperation between Indian and American forces will serve the interest of both countries to maintain peace in the region.  Also, having American forces in India will thwart Chinese/Pakistani nexus to initiate any foolish aggressive move towards India. 

I agree with the analysis of Mr. Bower as respects to containing China in the Asia-Pacific region.  However, Mr. Bower's emphasis is more towards protecting USA's interest with the support of India in that part of the world - which is OK.  My concern also goes for India's interest.  China has been occupying Indian territory - thousands and thousands of miles - since 1962.  Practically, every week there is a border violation in the Arunachal Pradesh part of India.  China is expanding its naval power in Balochistan Province of Pakistan by overtaking the Gwadar port.  China has on-going night-vision air force exercises in Tibet.  Basically, China's intention is to encircle India to establish its hegemony in that region.  I think India should not get trapped into the Sino-USA tussle.  Yes, India should honor any suggestion  emanating from the USA so long as that solution forces China to vacate all the Indian occupied territory and stop border violations.  China is terrorizing all its small neighboring countries, and India is the only country in that part of the world which can contain China to some extent.  HENCE, IT MAKES SENSE FOR THE INDO-US RELATIONS TO PROCEED TO THE NEXT LEVEL WHERE THE INTEREST OF BOTH COUNTRIES IS SERVED ADEQUATELY.

I agree wholeheartedly with the last sentence of this article in which the writer showed his unwillingness to arrange any meeting between Mr. Sharif and Mr. Singh.  The very fact that India has been going through these summit meetings since 1947 without any fruitful outcome indicates that arranging dialogues between India and Pakistan is a sheer waste of time and resources.  It is a fact that the elected civilian government in Islamabad has no control on the ISI/military nexus which is always working against India.  On going LOC violations are another examples of Islamabad's inability to control Pakistani military activities on the border.  Everywhere there is an instability in Pakistan like Jehadis in Pakistan move freely and killing innocent civilians every day, there is no control on the law and order situation, there is no consensus in the political circles to ameliorate relations between India and Pakistan, Karachi is burning, people in Balochistan are demanding separation from Pakistan, the Province of KP is on the verge of anarchy.  The civilian government is operating the country with its hands tied on the back.  THIS WRITER HOLDS A FIRM OPINION THAT INDIA SHOULD STOP SHOWIING AN OLIVE BRANCH TO PAKISTAN UNLESS THE FORMER SEES A REAL EFFORT ON THE PART OF LATTER TO IMPROVE BILATERAL RELATIONS.

What lMr. Ayaz is stating in his book "What's Wrong With Pakistan" is nothing new.  The whole world is aware of the basic problems Pakistan is going through.  Unfortunately, the civilian authorities in Pakistan are not capable of controlling the ISI/Military's moves in Pakistan, as respects to Pakistan's policies towards India are concerned.  Military/ISI nexus is running Pakistan and not the civilian government in Islamabad.  Unless drastic changes in  the organizational chart of the country are implemented, no one ought to expect any improvements in the relations between India and Pakistan.  Military/ISI should follow orders from the elected civilian government in Islamabad and not the other way around, Jehadi movement has to be eradicated along with shutting down the training camps, unauthorized madrassas needs to be closed and their activities monitored, Muslim and non-Muslim minorities' rights need to be protected, emphasis on quality education for all should be the national slogan.  CAN PAKISTANI LEADERS IN ISLAMABAD ASSURE THE NATION DELIVERY OF ALL THE ABOVE?

The statement made by one of the entities of Pakistan - Jammat-e-Islami - about 'Pakistan is a gift of Allah' sounds very ironical.  Of course, it is needless to say that everything on this earth is provided by Allah -the Almighty- and indeed ought to be treated as a gift by the human society.  This gift needs to be preserved, nurtured and protected adequately by human beings to show thankfulness to the Almighty God.  Unfortunately, this is not what is happening in Pakistan.  People, especially the female and non-Muslim minorities, do not have their basic rights fulfilled, no proper education, rampant terrorist activities, no law and order in the country and basically the country is engulfed with anarchy which is not the way to preserve and nurtured a gift. People in Balochistan are not happy and demanding separation from Pakistan, Karachi is burning everyday and people are being butchered by the fanatics, the Province of KP is also on the edge of turmoil.  Any one observing the present situation in Pakistan would be insane to say that this God-given gift is being preserved and nurtured to the extent it needs to be.  J-e-I is suggesting the implementation of Sharia Law as a panacea to the existing problems in Pakistan. However, they forget that this Sharia Law will take them back to the 7th century life style, and Pakistan will no way be able to exist for a long time and compete in the global market with the that life style.  In the 21st century, people would like to move forward whereas J-e-I is suggesting to reverse the cycle.  ALL I CAN SAY IS , MAY GOD BLESS PAKISTAN.

I agree with Mr. Advani.  Under the circumstances, it will be a futile effort and waste of time to show an olive branch to Mr. Sharif.  Ironically, the Pakistani Parliament recently adopted an anti-India resolution on the topic of what happened at LOC.  A resolution about Pakistan supporting the Kashmiri people was passed without any hitch in the Pakistani Parliament.  This writer holds a firm belief that the Indian government should not encourage any sort of dialogues between India and Pakistan until the later evinces some serious gesture to eradicate terrorism from its territory, hand over Mr. Dawood to the Indian government and shut down all terrorist camps etc. in Pakistan.  India has been holding these summit meetings with Pakistan since 1947 which includes three little battles, but without any concrete outcome.  IT IS ABOUT TIME THAT PAKISTAN IS MADE TO REALIZE THAT INDIA DOES NOT HAVE ANY MORE OPEN DOOR POLICY.  IT CAN ENTER THE DOOR ONLY WITH SERIOUS INTENTIONS - NO MORE TRICK.

These type of gestures emanating from the Muslim establishments are very encouraging to foster goodwill between the Muslim and non-Muslim communities. This small financial help will go a long away for establishing better understanding between the communities. This gesture reflects a sense of unity, oneness and love for all Indians irrespective of their religious beliefs. One would love to see similar concerns from other Muslim establishments, Dargahs, Imams and other entities when there is a problem in the non-Muslim neighborhoods. This is one of the ways through which lot of communal problems can be resolved and better understanding can be established. IT IS A VERY HEALTHY GESTURE ON THE PART OF AN ESTABLISHMENT OF AJMER SHARIF.

The flip-flop statements emanating from the official of Pakistani government are very annoying and confusing.  One day, the government representative states affirmatively the existence of Mr. Ibrahim in Pakistan and, obviously under pressure, the next day, the same statement is reversed.  It is immaterial whether the Pakistani government admits to his existence in Pakistan or not, but the wavering admittance of Mr. Ibrahim being in Pakistan leads one to believe that there is no sincere desire on the part of Pakistani government to better relations between India and Pakistan.  Under the circumstances, the Indian government ought not to offer any olive branch to the Pakistani government.

The comments released by a special envoy to Mr. Sharif indicate that Pakistan is still playing tricks and is not forthcoming on this issue.  Special Envoy says 'he believes' that Dawood is not in Pakistan.  He is not confirming Dawood's exit from Pakistan.  Also, if Mr. Sharif's government want to ameliorate relations between the two countries, why did they let Mr. Dawood leave? Why the Pakistani government did not arrest him and hand him over to the Indian government?  These are political gimmick and India ought to be very careful about this entrapment.  It is the third time Mr. Sharif is sitting on the throne of Islamabad.  Why did he not arrest Mr. Dawood before and hand him over to the Indian authorities?  Why all of a sudden this change?  Is he not listening to the ISI/military nexus who have been providing shelter to Mr. Dawood since 1993?  It is something which needs to be probed thoroughly.  Unless Pakistan helps eradicate terror menace from its territory completely, hand over Mr. Dawood to India, demolish terror camps in its territory, India ought not to move forward with any olive branch.  India has been engaged with Pakistan on multilevel dialogues since 1947, nothing concrete has come out of those summit meetings.  It is a sheer waste of time, money and resources.  LET PAKISTAN FIRST SHOW SOME SINCERE EFFORTS TO BE A PLEASANT. NEIGHBOR.

Gandhiji, this article is not saying anything which is not known to the public already.  However, what public may not be aware of the aftermath of Islamization.  Muslim population is growing by leaps and bounds especially in the UK and Europe.  In the next 20 years 30% of European population will be Muslim.  Same thing is occurring in the USA.  Basically, Muslims have a long term planning to be a major voting banks in the white societies and then rule.  Muslims are exploiting the soft hearted tenets of democracy and the white societies fail to comprehend Muslims' long range planning.  All this is happening with the help of petro-dollars.  Saudi Arabia and Iran are the main culprits and they are using Pakistan as a training ground to further their jihadi interest.  Unfortunately, the black gold of Middle East has put a veil in front of the eyes of white societies which is not realizing the long term effect of Islamization.  An economic interest has taken a precedence over the national security.  When Muslims say that they will unfurl Islamic flags over the White House and Queens' Mansion in London etc., it may not be a far fetched slogan. 

 

The only way to stop this jihadi movement is to make Saudi Arabia, Iran and Pakistan parking lots and take over the oil fields.  It sounds barbaric, but this is the solution.

 

The incidents narrated in this story are self-explanatory which basically ought to determine the basis of dealing with Pakistan on all security issues.  India should not believe in any of the statements emanating from Islamabad because the civilian government in Pakistan is not the one making foreign policy towards India.  It is the nexus of ISI/Military which is responsible for the foreign affairs as far as India is concerned.  The terror camps are controlled by ISI/Military and financed by the Saudi government.  Pakistan being a failed state has no money to waste on these terror camps.  It is a free flow of money from the Saudis who are determined to propagate Wahibism worldwide.  Saudis are utilizing Pakistan as a training ground to serve their own purpose.  All these trained fanatic graduates are sent worldwide whether there is a need in Syria,  Lebanon or anywhere else.  I like what Mr. Narender Modi said recently in one of the seminars that Pakistan has to be taught a lesson in the same language.  Mr. Antony's statement is OK under the circumstances, but should not be considered as the basis of complacency.  It is about time that Indian defense forces show some teeth on the LOC and the complacency should take root only when for every dead Indian soldier, at least ten Pakistanis lose their lives on the LOC.  Unless Pakistan pays a heavy price on the border, it will learn any lesson.  However, India should also review its policies towards Saudi Arabia for the simple reason that they are equally instrumental in spreading terror in the world by abetting  and financing the terror groups.
Mr. Sharif suggested that India and Pakistan should cut defense budgets as a gesture to improve relations between the two countries.  India ought to weigh this suggestion very carefully because what Mr. Sharif is saying may not be his words rather they may be portraying the intention of China who would like to see it happen to further its own hegemonic empire in the region easily.  India should not forget that after Mr. Sharif was elected as PM of Pakistan, he right away flew to see his big brother in Beijing for consultation.  THEREFORE, TO IGNORE THE NEXUS OF CHINA/PAKISTAN AGAINST INDIA WILL BE A FOLLY.

As we all know, the world is a male-dominated society and the women are considered a weaker sex which means in most of the countries women, especially the Muslim women, have a very little recourse to demand and gain their legitimate rights.  The lack of such outlets for the women definitely warrants special arrangement and channels through which they are able to achieve their rights.  However, setting separate courts which will operate under the Sharia/Koran laws to handle Muslim women's cases is little bit of the line concept. What does it show?  It shows that the law of the land is not able to deliver justice to the Muslim women and there is a need to set up parallel legal system which is not based on the law of the land.  Or is it that the governments in various states want to pacify the Muslim voting bank to maintain their own chairs.  Whatever the reason may be, this writer holds an opinion that by rectifying the existing laws, these female victims can enjoy a satisfactory results.

Mr. Modi has good intentions about the country and what Saint Ramdev is saying is also in the interest of India.  He is not preaching any monolithic religious teachings instead he is propagating the points which will eventually bring more prosperity in the country.  Can some one convince this writer what is wrong with Saint Ramdev's Policy?  Is bringing back  unaccounted funds sitting in foreign banks bad?   Is removal of corruption from the Indian system is adverse to the well-being of Indians?  Is the punishment he is suggesting for the criminals not adequate to overcome this menace from the society?  If everything what Saint Ramdev is saying is beneficial to the well-being of Indians and especially for the country as a whole, then what is the hitch not to implement this course of action?  Those who are in power but are not willing to initiate any action against the criminals leads one to conclude that they have some sort of collusion with the wrong-doers.  If that is the case, then I guess the decision lies with the electorates at the polling booth to bring some new leaders who are well wishers of India irrespective of the party they belong to.  India has lot of natural resources, lot of brains with good potential, a very powerful literate middle class along with a reliable military might.  These assets ought to bring India on the forefront of developed countries and under no circumstances should be allowed to stay behind the crowd due to a personal greed and corruption in the society.  THE PRESSURE IS ON THE VOTING BANKS OF INDIA TO MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION AT THE POLLING BOOTH.

It is a very good gesture to keep the dialogues between China and India open to ameliorate tension between these two countries.  However, one has to be very careful in displaying all the defense equipment and strategies in front of Chinese military personnel.  We all know that Chinese government has a long range objective and i.e. to establish its hegemony in that part of the world.  Their assertive attitude and claim over the South and East China Sea is a clear indication of their hegemonic posture.  Needless to say, China has been occupying thousand and thousand square miles of Indian territory in the Leh/Ladakh area since 1962 and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of China.  What does it show?  It shows Chinese expansionist policy in the region which is basically instrumental in creating a bad blood between China and all other nations situated on the embankment of South and East China Sea.   One can easily infer that by arranging and agreeing to these military/naval/air force exercises, China is curious to ascertain the might of Indian forces and also to judge the efficacy of Indian armament.  HENCE, THERE IS A GREAT NEED TO BE MORE CAREFUL IN AGREEING TO SUCH EXERCISES.

It is a very positive signal coming from the Chinese Ambassador regarding the expansion of a bilateral trade between India and China.  Also, it is very enlightening to note that the Chinese government is willing to address all the outstanding legitimate issues between these two countries whether they are in the arena of common borders, Tibet or flow of water.  Open and positive line of communication is essential to solve all mutual problems, but the only main ingredient of these dialogues ought to be that the end result should be fraught with 'win-win' situation.  Knowing what I know of the Chinese dealings with other nations, their main motive is "China first" which means it is good if it is good for China without any consideration to the other party's interest.  Hence, it is very crucial for the Indian government not to agree to any Chinese suggestions about the bilateral trade unless it is mutually beneficial.

While it is true that India should make use of all the flexibilities and positive attitude the Sharif government may show to ameliorate relationships between India and Pakistan, but one has to wonder as to how much power and final authority Mr. Sharif will have to accomplish this objective.  For a very simple reason that the military in Pakistan is not always in sync with the polity in Pakistan and also the influence of the rugged militant groups does not seem to be waning at all.  Hence, it is a very crucial enigma for Mr. Sharif to solve.  This writer is not suggesting at all not to pursue the path of peace and dialogues with the Sharif government, rather I am insinuating to be more careful before showing all your cards to the Pakistani leaders.  Knowing the history of summit meetings between India and Pakistan since 1947, one can easily conclude that peace can prevail in the region only if both parties are serious about it.  Unfortunately, what has been happening is that these meetings have not been able to produce any tangible results because it seemed to be a one-sided attempt.  The illegal border encroachment, the suicidal attacks in India perpetrated with the assistance of Pakistani leadership etc. are some of the very grave instances which are the stumbling blocks in the way of establishing peace in the region.  Can Mr. Sharif overcome this?  Can he control his military along with the elimination of activities of the militants in Pakistan?  This writer is very pessimistic about it.  Hence, my suggestion that India ought to walk very carefully on the path of peace with Pakistan.  Listen to them first and see what they can concretely deliver and then only proceed with a final decision.  EVERYBODY WANTS AND DESIRES PEACE IN THE REGION, BUT AT WHAT COST.

Mr. Saeed's outfit called JuD has a special budget allocation of millions of rupees in the Pakistani budget.  This very organization has been declared as a terrorist organization by the United States and in fact there is a bounty offer of $10 Million on Mr. Saeed.  On one hand, the Pakistani leaders are in favor of eliminating the terrorist activities in Pakistan and on the other hand, they are providing subsidies to the known terrorist.  How ironical?  Under the circumstances, one wonders if it really makes sense to carry on dialogues with the Pakistani leaders about improving relationship and expecting any cooperation which will bring peace to the region.  This writer has a very dismal hope towards achieving this goal.  If Pakistan is really serious about the eradication of terrorist activities, they should hand over Mr. Saeed to the Indian Government so that he can be brought to justice for what he has done in the Mumbai attack.  This writer fully understands an intricate situation the USA is caught in.  However, there has to be a limit of tolerance in every situation.  Most of the time, the world misinterprets a peaceful and lenient attitude of one party as a sign of weakness, and I think Pakistani leaders have been following this route as far as their relationship with the United States is concerned.  NOW IT IS UPTO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO DETERMINE AS TO HOW MUCH LEASH HAS TO BE RELEASED AROUND THE NECT OF PAKISTANI LEADERS.

Knowing the historical experience with China in 1962, does any one really believe in what the Chinese leaders say?  The main motive of Chinese leaders is to serve its own cause first whether it is relating to military, economy and diplomacy.  The Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai slogan is still fresh in the mind of Indians and should remain fresh all the times because the hegemonic attitude of China cann't be ignored.  The sudden increase in the economic power has accelerated the ambition of Chinese leaders to flex its muscles to encircle India - whether it is in Tibet, Pakistan or Sri Lanka etc.  Chinese non-bending attitude in Arunachal Pradesh as well as in Ladakh are live examples also, even though one cann't over look the problem China is going to create for India by constructing dams on the Brahmaputra River.  Needless to say, the positive and effusive statement of Premier Li in Pakistan is another firm signal to India about the 'all weather friendly' Chinese-Pakistan relationships. What does it tell you?  In simple words, this relationship is going to stay there until China achieves its own mission which is to use Pakistan against India for all intent and purposes.  Unfortunately, Pakistan does not get it that China is exploiting a weak military and economic position of Pakistan to fulfill its own objective.  It is true that India cann't do much to stop the infiltration of Chinese in every sphere of Pakistan, other than to raise hue and cry on one to one basis as well as on the international platforms.  However, India can definitely do one thing which is not to let its guards down and believe in everything China says on these diplomatic missions.  INDIA OUGHT TO REALIZE THAT IF THERE IS A WAR NEXT TIME, INDIA HAS TO FACE A DUAL WAR BOTH WITH CHINA AND PAKISTAN SIMULTANEOUSLY.  HENCE, THERE IS A NEED TO EQUIP THE INDIAN DEFENSE FORCES WITH QUALITY ARSENALS SECOND TO NONE.

This is another heinous crime perpetrated by the Muslim fundamentalists in the UK.    However, as the world knows, this is not the first time these brainwashed Muslims have committed such a crime against the civilians.  This is one of the many such acts committed by them in the past.  But the sad part is that the UK government fails to understand the mentality of these misguided Muslims and to initiate any serious action to stop or at least minimize these barbaric acts.  One can understand the democratic way of running the government, but one has also to understand the mentality of the people living under that system.  What these fundamentalists are doing is exploiting the soft tenets of democracy to further their own selfish causes, and mind you, the day is not too far when the whites in the UK will become minority and will be ruled by these fundamentalists unless the UK government changes its way of governing the country.  One of the best ways to get rid of this nuisance is to revise the immigration laws in the UK which means, first, to flush out all illegal aliens and secondly, those who have any criminal history put them behind bar for a long term and force them towards hard labor in the jail.  Thirdly, make a Declaration in the Constitution to the effect that anybody uttering, exciting others and committing any anti-national act will be treated as a traitor.  The UK government has no choice but to be very strict towards Muslim fundamentalists if they want to save the country failing which it is a matter of time when  once the superpower will be reduced to be subservient.  IS THAT WHAT THE LEADERS IN THE UK WAITING FOR?

It is very interesting to hear the comments of Chinese newly elected Premier in front of the Indian youth delegation visiting China in which he emphasized the need to shake hands with India.  He said that his comments are based on the experience he gained when he visited India about 15 years ago.  The warmth and true hospitality he received while in India those days contributed a lot in expressing this opinion.  However, somehow this writer is not impressed by his gestures because of what happened in 1962 is still alive in the mind of this writer, and for that matter India should not forget that incident that easily too.  On the one hand, Mr. Li is proposing a friendly relationship with India while on the other hand, Chinese military outfit is exerting all efforts to encircle India from all sides.  The latest incident is deployment of Chinese forces in the Daulat Beg, Ladakh area.  Firstly, China denied existence of any of its forces in Daulat Beg area and then after a comprehensive and intensive dialogue between India and China, the Chinese agreed to withdraw its forces from that part of India.  It is, therefore, of utmost importance for India to be more watchful while making any agreement with China.  India needs to play a hardball with China and ought not to sign any agreement or come to any understanding unless China first shows a sincere effort towards establishing friendly relations and it can encompass vacating Indian occupied territory, eliminating its hegemonic attitude in the South and East China sea area etc.  INDIA IS NOT THE SAME INDIA AS IT WAS IN 1962, AND I AM SURE CHINA HAS REALIZED IT, SO INDIA OUGHT TO PLAY ITS CARDS RIGHT.

Needless to say that China has been flexing its muscles all around India whether it is in the shape of grabbing territories, expansion of its naval might around India or establishing economic deals with the neighboring countries.  This is a clear signal to the whole world especially to India that China will do anything to establish its hegemony in that part of the world.  Even though they would like to achieve this objective peacefully, but they are ready to take a fight with any neighboring country, if need be,  Hence, the on-going rift of China with the countries surrounding in South and East China sea, along with encircling India in the Indian Ocean Region.  It is true that China has the financial strength to expand its military might to achieve its long range objective, but it is very important for the USA and Russia to take note of this development.  This writer hold an opinion that China is not a friend of anybody.  Their main motive is to exploit the situation wherever it is available to fulfill its own objective.  This increasing military and economic might of China will prove to be instrumental in dethroning the USA from the super power throne.  As far as India is concerned, it is a very opportune time to discuss any Chinese involvement in Pakistan forcefully - whether it is controlling the Gawadar port or extension of nuclear technology - with a newly elected government.  Mr. Nawaj Sharif, as he stated, would like to improve economic ties with India which provides India a solid chance to judge the seriousness of Pakistan what Mr. Sharif is saying.  Russia has provided lot of military technology and armament to China, but Russia also needs to play its cards very carefully with China.  It is true that both nations follow the tenets of communism, but China's long range ideology rests with "CHINA FIRST".  TIMES AHEAD ARE ROUGH, HENCE THERE IS A NEED OF A GREAT DEAL OF CAUTION WHILE DEALING WITH CHINA.

Here we go again.  The Chinese government is showing its true color by pushing its forces and erecting tents and other structures into an Indian territory.  The only response from the Indian officials is that 'India is well equipped to defend itself'.  This response is neither enough to stop Chinese incursion nor is it a solution to the on-going offensive moves of the Chinese government.  Needless to say, the Chinese government is flexing its muscles all over whether it is in the Ladakh, India or in the Chinese south or East China Sea areas.  Basically, China wants to establish its hegemony in that part of the world. Unfortunately, neither there is any effort on the part of Indian government to have these incursions and offensive attitude of China highlighted on the International forums nor is there any agitation against these moves from Russia - the close ally of India - and USA.  As the whole world knows, China has been occupying thousands of square miles of an Indian territory since 1962 in the Ladakh area, and in spite of numerous efforts on the part of India, China is not vacating that illegally occupied territory.  Hence, the need of an urgent military action on the part of India to thwart Chinese future moves of expansionism.  From a global standpoint, this writer holds an opinion that there is a need that the USA and Russia openly criticize these hegemonic Chinese moves before it becomes a headache for them too.  TIME IS NOW FOR THE USA AND RUSSIA TO MONITOR CHINESE ACTIVITIES AND CONDEMN THESE OFFENSIVE MOVES.

It is very astonishing to see how openly Mr. Yasin Malik is mingling with the LeT member Mr. Saeed in Pakistan and the Indian government failed to take any stern action to declare him a traitor.   Even though Mr. Yasin Malik lives in J & K, but has an easy access to the LeT leader.  One should not forget that it was Mr. Saeed among others who orchestrated a Mumbai attack.  It appears that Mr. Malik is one of the militants who help create terrorist cells in India and is, needless to say, a security threat for the country.  It is very essential for the Indian Government to keep a watchful eye on the activities of people like Mr. Malik.  These are the people providing all the in-house assistance to the Indian Mujahddins who end up creating a chaotic situation like a recent blast in Hyderabad.  He is one of the brainwashed people which is very clear from his comments he made to the newsman when asked about the revocation of his passport and a possible jail term.  He said 'let me rot in jail'.  These militants exploit the soft tenets of democracy.  I wonder if he could act the same way in any of the Muslim countries the way he is acting in India.  I have no doubt that he will be executed without wasting any time.  May be it is about time to treat the traitors differently and expeditiously by setting up special courts to bring these traitors to books.  If it warrants an amendment to the Indian Constitution, so be it.  THIS IS AN EVIL AND ROTTEN SEED AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BLOSSOM.